Evolution & Education February 23, 2009
Posted by Moonstruck Mommy in Life.Tags: Christianity, Education, Evolution, Origins and Creation, Perspectives, Religion and Spirituality, Video, YouTube
6 comments
I was looking around Youtube a while ago and I came across these clips. I am sure they are not new, but they caught my interest all the same. They are about evolution and America and pretty much say that the more education a person has the more likely they are to believe in evolution.
I think I fall in the “helped by God” category. I know that things evolve, there is proof, but I don’t think that means there isn’t a God. I can’t decide what I make of this video though. A guess one reason for the difference could be that people that attended more school might have studied more about what evolution really is. Of course it is just a poll, but it is still pretty interesting numbers. I am curious what other people think… about evolution and about these videos.
Moonstruck Mommy

America, land of justified murders November 2, 2008
Posted by Moonstruck Mommy in Politics.Tags: Amnesty International, capital punishment, crime, death penalty, drug abuse, drugs, Education, execution, justice, mental illness, penal system, Politics, prison, prison reform, sentencing, victim
1 comment so far
“When in Gregg v. Georgia the Supreme Court gave its seal of approval to capital punishment, this endorsement was premised on the promise that capital punishment would be administered with fairness and justice. Instead, the promise has become a cruel and empty mockery. If not remedied, the scandalous state of our present system of capital punishment will cast a pall of shame over our society for years to come. We cannot let it continue.” -Justice Thurgood Marshall (1990).
Scandalous is exactly the right word to describe the United States system for handing down the death penalty. Severity of the crime is not what is determining who receives life without parole and who gets a death sentence. The majority of the time it is race of the victim, lack of adequate representation, and gender. The United States needs to put an end to capital punishment because of the unfair sentencing. Although some believe the death penalty is less expensive than life in prison and may be a deterrent to crime, the statistics show it is simply not true.
Study after study has shown that there is a connection between the race of the victim and the future for the accused. People that kill white victims are far more likely to get the death penalty and be executed then those that kill black victims. Since 1976, the reinstatement of the death penalty, and January 1, 2008 there have been 1,099 executions. Of those, 228 were black defendants with white victims and only 15 were white defendants with black victims. Furthermore, of the 1,099 execution that have taken place 78.71% involved a white victim. (Fins, 2008) A study done in North Carolina based on data from 1993 to 1997 found that defendants whose victims were whites were 3.5 times more like to receive the death penalty. (Boger & Unah, 2001) This shows an obvious bias toward who is executed.
A lack of sufficient counsel is also a source of concern regarding capital punishment and its sentencing. Court appointed attorneys for capital punishment cases are extremely busy, not paid very well, and usually lack the experience necessary to save their clients life. There have also been instances of court appointed attorneys sleeping through trials, showing up under the influence of alcohol, or not showing up at all. “An examination of 461 capital cases by The Dallas Morning News found that nearly one in four condemned inmates has been represented at trial or on appeal by court-appointed attorneys who have been disciplined for professional misconduct at some point in their careers.”(Staff Writers of the Dallas Morning News, 2000) Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg put it best in 2001,
“People who are well represented at trial do not get the death penalty. . . . I have yet to see a death case among the dozens coming to the Supreme Court on eve-of-execution stay applications in which the defendant was well represented at trial.”
Without someone fighting the case there is no possible way to win, innocent or not.
Although woman account for 1 in 10 murder arrests they only account for 1 in 50 death sentences and 1 in 92 executions. (Death Penalty Information Center, 2001) Women are also less likely to sit on death row. It is understandable that society has a hard time putting a woman to death, but then why not for men? Why is it more acceptable for one gender to kill then the other?
People that are for the death penalty have their reasons. Some say that it is for the victims’ families, but killing a defendant could never bring someone back. Another argument is that keeping these prisoners in jail for life would be too expensive. However, to maintain the death penalty system, California pays $114 million a year over what it would cost for life without parole. Also, it costs $90,000 more per person a year to house death row inmates because of their cells and security. (Tempest, 2005) Lastly, many capital punishment supporters believe that it is a deterrent to murder. It is good in theory, but it doesn’t work in real life. People aren’t thinking clear enough during a murder to be expected to care about the future if they might get the death penalty for their actions. The Death Penalty Information Center says: “When comparisons are made between states with the death penalty and states without, the majority of death penalty states show murder rates higher than non-death penalty states. The average of murder rates per 100,000 population in 1999 among death penalty states was 5.5, whereas the average of murder rates among non-death penalty states was only 3.6.”(Cooper, 2007)
While most of the World has protections in place against executing the mentally ill, the United States does not and has executed 100 people since 1977. (Amnesty International, 2008) Also, new research into the drugs used in the lethal injection cocktail is disheartening. The death could actually be felt by some and even be painful for others. So much so that a federal judge in California ruled the injection program was unconstitutional because it represented “cruel and unusual punishment”.(Reilly, 2007) There are also cases of innocent people being finally freed by advancements like DNA testing. What about the next advancement that clears a new round of innocent people? How can America justify taking one innocent life?
References
Amnesty International. (2008). Mental Illness – 100 Executions. Retrieved September 20, 2008, from
Amnesty International USA: http://www.amnestyusa.org/death-penalty/execution-of-mentally-
ill/mental-illness—100-executions/page.do?id=1101132&n1=3&n2=28&n3=105
Boger, B., & Unah, I. (2001). Race and the Death Penalty in North Carolina An Empirical Analysis: 1993-
1997. North Carolina: The Common Sense Foundation.
Cooper, D. (2007, January). Deterrence: States Without the Death Penalty Have Had Consistently Lower
Murder Rates. Retrieved September 19, 2008, from Death Penalty Information Center:
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/deterrence-states-without-death-penalty-have-had-consistently-lower-murder-rates
Death Penalty Information Center. (2001, December 31). Women & the Death Penalty. Retrieved
September 18, 2008, from Death Penalty Information Center:
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/women-and-death-penalty
Fins, D. (2008). Death Row USA. New York: NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund.
Reilly, M. (2007, April 24). Lethal injection drugs ‘unreliable’. NewScientist .
Staff Writers of the Dallas Morning News. (2000, September 10). Quality of Justice. The Dallas Morning
News , pp. 1-6.
Tempest, R. (2005, March 6). “Death Row Often Means a Long Life; California condemns many murderers, but few are ever
executed”. Los Angeles Times , p. B.1.
Moonstruck Mommy
Just lock ‘em up! October 29, 2008
Posted by Moonstruck Mommy in Politics.Tags: addict, addiction, corrections, crime, drug abuse, drugs, Education, inmate, jail, justice, mental illness, parole, prison, prison reform, recidivism, rehabilitation
add a comment
“Sixty-seven percent of former inmates released from State prisons in 1994 committed at least one serious new crime within the following three years.” (Langan & Levin, 2002)
The growing rate of recidivism in America is alarming. The jails are becoming overcrowded, there is more crime, and it is extremely expensive to shelter all these inmates. It really is not their fault though; a lot of inmates suffer from addiction and mental problems and most aren’t very educated. In order to slow down recidivism change is needed in the way inmates are handled in jail and when they are released.
There are three main reasons why the rate of recidivism is so high. In 2004 an estimated 333,000 prisoners were held for drug law violations. In Federal prison 45% of inmates reported drug use in the month before their offense and 58% reported regular drug use. In State prison, 56% of inmates reported drug use in the month prior and 69% reported regular drug use. (Karberg & Mumola, 1999) As long as they continue to do drugs they will continue to end up back in prison. Lack of education is another reason. According to Harlow (2003), 68% of inmates did not receive a high school diploma. These poor education qualifications will make finding a job and keeping your life stable and crime free more difficult. The last reason is that so many inmates have untreated mental health problems. A 2005 study by James and Glaze noted that as much as 45% of Federal and 56% of State inmates have some kind of mental problem. Besides being more prone to act out it is also hard to keep a job when suffering from many mental disorders.
The first place to start to fix this problem is on the inside. Weights, televisions, cigarettes, and conjugal visits will be removed from all prisons, because let’s face it, it is not summer camp. When an inmate arrives they will be given a counselor, this person will help them set up all their appointments and basically keep them on track. All inmates will be required to go to group therapy and if it is deemed necessary one on one counseling. There will be drug testing and classes for all inmates and rehabilitation programs for anyone that needs it. These programs will be mandatory if someone is arrested for drugs or tests dirty for drugs while in jail. An education program will be implemented and enforced. The Three State Recidivism Study (2001) showed that attending school behind bars reduced the likelihood of re-incarceration by 29%. Any inmate that does not have a GED will be required to work on obtaining it, for those that have finished high school there will be other options. Online college classes are a great way for inmates to better themselves and, for the well behaved, work-training programs outside of the prison.
The help can not stop there though. It’s when the inmate gets out of prison that they need the assistance most of all. Parole officers shouldn’t be whistle blowers they should be guidance counselors back into society. They should desperately want their inmates to succeed and do everything in their power to help them. The ex-inmates need help finding a place to live, a job, and transportation. They also need to sign up for drug classes, group therapy, and counseling once out of prison. If continuing their education is important then their parole/probation officer can help with that as well.
It is obvious that tough on crime isn’t working. These are addicts and people with mental illnesses that need help and treatment, not to be thrown in and out of prison their whole life. All of these programs will cost money, probably a lot, but considering that in 1996 it cost California an average of $25,000 per inmate and there were over 145,000 inmates housed, it can’t possibly be more costly to try. With the right education, the right treatment, and the right surroundings they could be completely different people. Imagine what our society would be like if we allowed them to be a good influence instead of a bad.
References
Glaze, L. & James, D. (2006) Mental Health Problems of Prison and Jail Inmates Washington
DC: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, NCJ-213600.
Harlow, C. (2003). Education and Correctional Populations Washington DC: US Department of
Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, NCJ-195670.
Karberg, J. & Mumola, C. (1999). Substance Abuse and Treatment, State and Federal Prisoners,
1997 Washington DC: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, NCJ-
172871
Langan, P & Levin, D. (2002). Recidivism of Prisoners in 1994 Washington DC: US
Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, NCJ-193427.
Smith, L., Steurer, S., & Tracy, A. (2001). Three-State Recidivism Study Latham, MD:
Correctional Education Association
One Last note– NONE of my thoughts or ideas apply to sexual predators. It has been proven that they DO NOT change and should not be allowed in society. Especially ANYONE that hurts a child. I say we send THEM to an island and use it as practice grounds for these–

I know, I know… it seems harsh after what I just wrote about addicts and crazies, but stupid fucking men that have issues with their small dicks need to deal with their shit and STOP raping women. And all you crazy, fucked up, men and women that would EVER touch a child– just know that there is a special place in Hell waiting for YOU!













